Contagion
This was definitely not a feel good film, and it did border on
being a horror movie, which aren’t my usual type of cup of tea. It was
well made, well acted, and suspenseful. Not escapist, either, nor very
close to it. So if you have fun at horror movies, you might not have as
much with Contagion.
The real horror will probably be felt by people with OCD-type
tendencies, and for the rest of us, well, there isn’t much to make you
feel too good. If you’re someone who is hygienically disgusting, then I
would recommend that you do watch Contagion and pay attention, however.
Generally, this is a better movie than the
majority of them being put out. I was a bit surprised at first that the
guy who wrote The Informant! wrote this one as well,
but only because of the genre switch. I think he could have a real gem
on his hands if he can fuse the tones of that previous film with the one
in Contagion,
or rather meet them in the middle for another film, one where there’s
the usual display of intelligence but also opportunities for the audience to feel like they can smile.
The Conspirator
I enjoyed this one, and also felt a loss of faith in earthly, absolute power afterwards. I read the book Lies My Teacher Told Me, about how certain high school and college textbooks present history in boring and inaccurate ways, and the story in The Conspirator seems to me to be one which the author of Lies My Teacher Told Me might possibly approve of to be included in his ideal history book.
I can't elaborate on that without spoiling the film, but I will say that I don't remember much of the events that The Conspirator depicts being taught in any of my high school history classes, but perhaps I would've paid more attention if they had been mentioned--aside from the already well-known "John Wilkes Booth shot Abraham Lincoln" thing. Perhaps some current students will be fortunate enough to have a cool history teacher who'll show The Conspirator in class.
Anyway, this post over at chud.com's forum can pretty much sum up how I liked The Conspirator, excepting the gripe about lens flares, which I didn't notice during my viewing of the film.
...from the mind of a guy named Derrick, who doesn't always write with good grammar and spelling.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Paul & The Debt
Paul
Well, Paul was a bit of a disappointment to me. The stuff about religion is already well documented, and that was a let down for me too, but the first thing that took it down a notch was the realization that this was going to be another “alien on the run from the government” film. I guess, for the first time in awhile, I wanted less plot, or rather less reliance or obligation to one, and more “hanging out” for the characters, seeing more of what Paul could do when not under stress. Maybe next movie, when the cast doesn’t include an extra-terrestrial.
The Debt
Great movie, but not easy to watch. The unease is a consequence of well-directed scenes calling for pain and blood, and these scenes deliver, almost, if not necessarily. There’s two time settings here, one close to modern, and one in the past. Helen Mirren anchors the later time setting, and she’s excellent--no surprise there. And Tom Wilkinson plays a damned dirty bastard--real good at that, he is. The earlier time setting is great because of the inter-play between the main characters--three actors with a nice range of emotion among them. And the guy playing the younger version of Wilkinson’s character is pretty good at being a bastard, but he’s no Wilkinson. Helen Mirren’s counterpart is haunting.
The Debt isn’t like smooth James Bond, and it’s not even smoother than Casino Royale/Quantum of Solace Bond. Well, it’s not James Bond at all. I only bring that name up because the characters in The Debt are secret agents. And to me, they can be put up there along Bond, closer to Bourne (as in 'Identity'), but more real than both. And The Debt is a real good one, whether you’re a fan of James and/or Jason, or not.
Well, Paul was a bit of a disappointment to me. The stuff about religion is already well documented, and that was a let down for me too, but the first thing that took it down a notch was the realization that this was going to be another “alien on the run from the government” film. I guess, for the first time in awhile, I wanted less plot, or rather less reliance or obligation to one, and more “hanging out” for the characters, seeing more of what Paul could do when not under stress. Maybe next movie, when the cast doesn’t include an extra-terrestrial.
The Debt
Great movie, but not easy to watch. The unease is a consequence of well-directed scenes calling for pain and blood, and these scenes deliver, almost, if not necessarily. There’s two time settings here, one close to modern, and one in the past. Helen Mirren anchors the later time setting, and she’s excellent--no surprise there. And Tom Wilkinson plays a damned dirty bastard--real good at that, he is. The earlier time setting is great because of the inter-play between the main characters--three actors with a nice range of emotion among them. And the guy playing the younger version of Wilkinson’s character is pretty good at being a bastard, but he’s no Wilkinson. Helen Mirren’s counterpart is haunting.
The Debt isn’t like smooth James Bond, and it’s not even smoother than Casino Royale/Quantum of Solace Bond. Well, it’s not James Bond at all. I only bring that name up because the characters in The Debt are secret agents. And to me, they can be put up there along Bond, closer to Bourne (as in 'Identity'), but more real than both. And The Debt is a real good one, whether you’re a fan of James and/or Jason, or not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)